|
Style 20 Style 19 Style 18 Style 17 Style 16 Style 15 Style 14 Style 13 Style 12 Style 11 Style 10 Style 9 Style 8 Style 7 Style 6 Style 5 Style 4 Style 3 Style 2 Style 1
 
Board index Discussions General Discussion

Welcome Anonymous !

It is currently April 23rd, 2014, 8:44 am

Anekee van der Velden, I'm calling BS on this one.

Breasts, topics of interest, shiny things, whatever.

Moderators: Tina, MrHHH

Anekee van der Velden, I'm calling BS on this one.

Postby merkitty » November 13th, 2006, 9:42 pm

Anekee van der Velden is to be said to be a 36DD... either bust sizes don't translate correctly, or my girlfriend who is a 40DD is not...

tiny link
Last edited by merkitty on November 14th, 2006, 6:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
merkitty
 
Posts: 449
Joined: March 3rd, 2006, 10:19 am

Postby humblefool » November 14th, 2006, 2:09 am

What exactly are you objecting to, the 36 or the DD? Remember, the 36 in an underneath measure, not around the breasts.

Though that picture does have her thrusting her chest out pretty good, and it might be slightly fish-eye-lensed as well.
User avatar
humblefool
 
Posts: 312
Joined: March 18th, 2005, 11:21 pm

Postby Prophet Tenebrae » November 14th, 2006, 3:05 am

Hate to break it to you chief but the ship has sailed on Anekee... two years ago, I think.

Spawning several lengthy threads about whether Anekee was using morphed pictures or not. Go look if you don't believe me.

In any event, I'd not convict people on bra sizes. They're not very good at measuring anything yadda yadda.
User avatar
Prophet Tenebrae
 
Posts: 1435
Joined: February 27th, 2005, 5:28 pm

Postby Lightfoot » November 14th, 2006, 5:04 am

Where did this come from? Why does it matter anyway?

BTW: you might not want to hotlink a picture to the forum here.
User avatar
Lightfoot
 
Posts: 243
Joined: October 8th, 2005, 1:05 am

Postby merkitty » November 14th, 2006, 7:01 am

Prophet Tenebrae wrote:Hate to break it to you chief but the ship has sailed on Anekee... two years ago, I think.

Spawning several lengthy threads about whether Anekee was using morphed pictures or not. Go look if you don't believe me.

In any event, I'd not convict people on bra sizes. They're not very good at measuring anything yadda yadda.


I'm sure, but I'm actually pretty good at measurements by eye shot... My girlfriend said she was a 36 DD, I could tell just by eyeing her she wasn't... and I said she was a 40, she went to get a fitting done, and I was right...

I sort of pride myself on that, at least when it comes to natural breasts, fake ones, well when it comes to porn stars, and models, I don't dare try... they always exaggerate anyway.

I am not saying she isn't large busted, but I did some research of my own, and found a few sites stating that she has been morphed, by the looks of it I have to agree. BTW that is to a photo, not a website proving it...

No one I know of, and that includes women who are 36DD and under 5 ft 3, has cleavage that vast... and that much of her body in the pool still...

Those would be considered DDD not DD, and I can vouch for that because I've dated someone with DDD/G breasts. By her body size, and the amount of space she takes in the pool I would have to say she is at least between five foot 5 and five foot 7.

The boat may of sailed but someone pointed me towards her, and although amused, I am not impressed... at least in what was boasting about being natural...
User avatar
merkitty
 
Posts: 449
Joined: March 3rd, 2006, 10:19 am

Postby Q-BE » November 14th, 2006, 1:53 pm

humblefool wrote:What exactly are you objecting to, the 36 or the DD? Remember, the 36 in an underneath measure, not around the breasts.

The 36 reported on a bra is a measurement of the breasts around their fullest point, usually the nipple. The bra cup size is calculated by subtracting the circumference of the ribcage from that number (e.g., 36) and using a chart for the number of inches difference. A=1", B=2", C=3", etc.

Q-"JCPenny's catalogues are very informative in this regard"-BE :twisted:
User avatar
Q-BE
Forum Monkey
 
Posts: 1080
Joined: May 30th, 2006, 6:15 am
Location: Playing hide & no seek

Postby Ferret » November 14th, 2006, 2:09 pm

I would disagree with her breast size..... :lol:

If they are an E they are very large.....oh well.
“The Web brings people together because no matter what kind of a twisted sexual mutant you happen to be, you’ve got millions of pals out there. Type in ‘Find people that have sex with goats that are on fire’ and the computer will say, ‘Specify type of goat.’” --Richard Jeni

-My deviantArt page - FerretMorphs
User avatar
Ferret
 
Posts: 1263
Joined: June 15th, 2006, 4:49 pm

Postby humblefool » November 14th, 2006, 5:30 pm

Q-BE wrote:
humblefool wrote:What exactly are you objecting to, the 36 or the DD? Remember, the 36 in an underneath measure, not around the breasts.

The 36 reported on a bra is a measurement of the breasts around their fullest point, usually the nipple. The bra cup size is calculated by subtracting the circumference of the ribcage from that number (e.g., 36) and using a chart for the number of inches difference. A=1", B=2", C=3", etc.

Q-"JCPenny's catalogues are very informative in this regard"-BE :twisted:


I've always been told the number is the ribcage measure... oh well.
User avatar
humblefool
 
Posts: 312
Joined: March 18th, 2005, 11:21 pm

Postby BillPratt » November 14th, 2006, 9:19 pm

Humble fool, you have been educated correctly. The number (band) is the ribcage right below the breasts and the letter is a function of the difference between the bust and the band.
BillPratt
 
Posts: 1094
Joined: August 8th, 2005, 10:29 am

Postby Q-BE » November 15th, 2006, 10:15 am

BillPratt wrote:Humble fool, you have been educated correctly. The number (band) is the ribcage right below the breasts and the letter is a function of the difference between the bust and the band.

Wha? :huh:

So the "number" is the ribcage measurement, not the measurement around the breasts?

*is confused* :x

Q-"Need some more learnin' "-BE
User avatar
Q-BE
Forum Monkey
 
Posts: 1080
Joined: May 30th, 2006, 6:15 am
Location: Playing hide & no seek

Postby Splinter271 » November 15th, 2006, 11:37 am

Q-BE wrote:So the "number" is the ribcage measurement, not the measurement around the breasts?


Aye aye cap'n.
User avatar
Splinter271
 
Posts: 329
Joined: September 13th, 2005, 4:18 pm

Postby BillPratt » November 15th, 2006, 8:27 pm

Yup. 40 DD means that the breasts themeselves add as much circumference as a lass of 34 DD.
BillPratt
 
Posts: 1094
Joined: August 8th, 2005, 10:29 am

Postby Plug-n-Play » November 16th, 2006, 6:59 pm

(heh, I started this post earlier today, but got completely sidetracked)

On Anekee: I don't know about here, but on the BEA this particular horse has been flogged to death, dug up, taped together, and flogged to death again. In fact, I think this has gone through enough iterations on the BEA to cause the general population there to convulse at the mere mention of it (usually by newbies). Okay, maybe 'convulse' is a bit strong (or perhaps not strong enough), but it's one of those "I'd rather be lurking than posting" situations.

I had another thought regarding this thread, but it's gone now. :P

Plug-"damn forgettory"-n-Play
User avatar
Plug-n-Play
 
Posts: 618
Joined: August 10th, 2006, 9:49 pm
Location: Canuck in Texas

Postby BillPratt » November 16th, 2006, 8:54 pm

Thoughts are overrated anyway. I try to avoid them whenever possible to keep from getting distracted.
BillPratt
 
Posts: 1094
Joined: August 8th, 2005, 10:29 am

Postby IceOwl » November 20th, 2006, 4:25 pm

In a business where people are billed as having a 42XXX bra size, and a fetish where nothing is real, I still have to ask, why does anyone care? If a morph artist posts a morph, do you criticize them for posting morphs? Doesn't it achieve the same effect no matter what?

You're likely never going to meet her anyway, and if you do, she'll probably let you in on the joke. Or make you a part of it.

Don't be a joke.
The more confusion... the more profit.
User avatar
IceOwl
 
Posts: 281
Joined: January 13th, 2005, 2:22 pm
Location: Om

Postby merkitty » November 20th, 2006, 8:46 pm

IceOwl wrote:In a business where people are billed as having a 42XXX bra size, and a fetish where nothing is real, I still have to ask, why does anyone care? If a morph artist posts a morph, do you criticize them for posting morphs? Doesn't it achieve the same effect no matter what?

You're likely never going to meet her anyway, and if you do, she'll probably let you in on the joke. Or make you a part of it.

Don't be a joke.


When you buy a diamond ring, being sold as a genuine diamond, then find out that it is cubic zirconia, you'd be a little pissed off.

Not to mention I believe if you are going to make money do it honestly or not at all.
User avatar
merkitty
 
Posts: 449
Joined: March 3rd, 2006, 10:19 am

Postby IceOwl » November 21st, 2006, 12:20 am

merkitty wrote:
IceOwl wrote:In a business where people are billed as having a 42XXX bra size, and a fetish where nothing is real, I still have to ask, why does anyone care? If a morph artist posts a morph, do you criticize them for posting morphs? Doesn't it achieve the same effect no matter what?

You're likely never going to meet her anyway, and if you do, she'll probably let you in on the joke. Or make you a part of it.

Don't be a joke.


When you buy a diamond ring, being sold as a genuine diamond, then find out that it is cubic zirconia, you'd be a little pissed off.

Not to mention I believe if you are going to make money do it honestly or not at all.


Are you buying Anekee? Is the guy who runs Farang Ding Dong ripping people off because he sells pictures of girls with enormous but very obviously fake breasts? Keep in mind, if you pay money, for any kind of not-in-person adult entertainment, you are buying a fantasy, not a person.

If you call one of those phone sex lines they advertise in the middle of the night, do you actually expect to talk to the girls in the commercial?
The more confusion... the more profit.
User avatar
IceOwl
 
Posts: 281
Joined: January 13th, 2005, 2:22 pm
Location: Om

Postby merkitty » November 21st, 2006, 7:29 am

IceOwl wrote:
merkitty wrote:
IceOwl wrote:In a business where people are billed as having a 42XXX bra size, and a fetish where nothing is real, I still have to ask, why does anyone care? If a morph artist posts a morph, do you criticize them for posting morphs? Doesn't it achieve the same effect no matter what?

You're likely never going to meet her anyway, and if you do, she'll probably let you in on the joke. Or make you a part of it.

Don't be a joke.


When you buy a diamond ring, being sold as a genuine diamond, then find out that it is cubic zirconia, you'd be a little pissed off.

Not to mention I believe if you are going to make money do it honestly or not at all.


Are you buying Anekee? Is the guy who runs Farang Ding Dong ripping people off because he sells pictures of girls with enormous but very obviously fake breasts? Keep in mind, if you pay money, for any kind of not-in-person adult entertainment, you are buying a fantasy, not a person.

If you call one of those phone sex lines they advertise in the middle of the night, do you actually expect to talk to the girls in the commercial?


Actually that is an opinion which I can argue...

Your point is somewhat moot, with a phone sex operator you call and talk to someone, who knows from where...

When you buy time, or something off of someone's personal web site, you expect something else. (which I did not do)

It would be as if my selling my Mischief Mats online, and telling you, you get one free if you buy two, but instead I decide without writing it down anywhere on the site that it only happens once a month on a day of my choosing.

Then not only is bad business, that can lead to a lot of false advertising and lawsuits. Something that if someone was angry enough to do to this "girl" would be an option.
User avatar
merkitty
 
Posts: 449
Joined: March 3rd, 2006, 10:19 am

Postby IceOwl » November 21st, 2006, 5:37 pm

merkitty wrote:
IceOwl wrote:
merkitty wrote:
IceOwl wrote:In a business where people are billed as having a 42XXX bra size, and a fetish where nothing is real, I still have to ask, why does anyone care? If a morph artist posts a morph, do you criticize them for posting morphs? Doesn't it achieve the same effect no matter what?

You're likely never going to meet her anyway, and if you do, she'll probably let you in on the joke. Or make you a part of it.

Don't be a joke.


When you buy a diamond ring, being sold as a genuine diamond, then find out that it is cubic zirconia, you'd be a little pissed off.

Not to mention I believe if you are going to make money do it honestly or not at all.


Are you buying Anekee? Is the guy who runs Farang Ding Dong ripping people off because he sells pictures of girls with enormous but very obviously fake breasts? Keep in mind, if you pay money, for any kind of not-in-person adult entertainment, you are buying a fantasy, not a person.

If you call one of those phone sex lines they advertise in the middle of the night, do you actually expect to talk to the girls in the commercial?


Actually that is an opinion which I can argue...

Your point is somewhat moot, with a phone sex operator you call and talk to someone, who knows from where...


Ah, so you don't expect to talk to the girls in the commercial? If that's so why is Anekee any different? If Anekee should be sued for false advertising, why aren't the phone sex lines having the same done to them? They clearly advertise as though you'll talk to the girls in the commercial, but everyone knows you won't!

When you buy time, or something off of someone's personal web site, you expect something else. (which I did not do)


If you didn't pay for any of any Anekee's pictures, then what are you complaining about? Whether she was real or fake, would you ever know the difference?

It would be as if my selling my Mischief Mats online, and telling you, you get one free if you buy two, but instead I decide without writing it down anywhere on the site that it only happens once a month on a day of my choosing.


It would be more like selling your Mischief Mats online and telling people they're blue when they're actually red. Only a two year old would care.

Then not only is bad business, that can lead to a lot of false advertising and lawsuits. Something that if someone was angry enough to do to this "girl" would be an option.


It absolutely would not be an option. Selling pictures on the internet is not false advertising, and even in Anekee's case, you still get exactly what you see.

I'll repeat it again just in case you ignored it the first time: You are buying a fantasy, not a person.
The more confusion... the more profit.
User avatar
IceOwl
 
Posts: 281
Joined: January 13th, 2005, 2:22 pm
Location: Om

Postby merkitty » November 21st, 2006, 9:25 pm

No, you are purchasing a service, not a person.
User avatar
merkitty
 
Posts: 449
Joined: March 3rd, 2006, 10:19 am

Postby IceOwl » November 21st, 2006, 9:27 pm

The service is plainly advertised as is. The service is a fantasy. You are buying a fantasy.
The more confusion... the more profit.
User avatar
IceOwl
 
Posts: 281
Joined: January 13th, 2005, 2:22 pm
Location: Om

Postby merkitty » November 21st, 2006, 9:40 pm

IceOwl wrote:The service is plainly advertised as is. The service is a fantasy. You are buying a fantasy.


A fantasy mayhap, but if it going to be a fantasy, get the information straight, and work with it, not keep on changing the fantasy at a whim.

The fact is that people pay for the fantasy, the fact is though that even though it is fantasy, she is not selling a fantasy as you are stating, she is selling herself, her mind, and her skills...

I appreciate all visitors who wish to understand me by reading what I have produced, but to see pics of me or my friends, though, is to pay the $30 monthly subscription. The price is about the pay-toll between Milan and Rome. I would hope that you are here for my writings, and so therefore I have no sympathy for your desire to possess copyrighted images of me and my friends without payment.


The site is either a porn site, or a site to begin to understand her inner workings, and in thus learning more about her, her being, and her a person, to understand that there is more to a person than physical looks...

So what is it? Is it a site for porn and fantasy, or is it a site that is more than that?

If it is for porn and fantasy, then you are right, if it is not, then your argument holds about as much water as cheese cloth.

Either she is selling porn, or not, if she isn't selling porn, then she is selling her skills, and abilities, and if she is selling that, then there is a claim for false advertisement.
User avatar
merkitty
 
Posts: 449
Joined: March 3rd, 2006, 10:19 am

Postby IceOwl » November 21st, 2006, 10:11 pm

merkitty wrote:
IceOwl wrote:The service is plainly advertised as is. The service is a fantasy. You are buying a fantasy.


A fantasy mayhap, but if it going to be a fantasy, get the information straight, and work with it, not keep on changing the fantasy at a whim.


They can change the fantasy if they want to. If you don't like it, too bad for you.

The fact is that people pay for the fantasy,


And they get exactly what was advertised.

the fact is though that even though it is fantasy, she is not selling a fantasy as you are stating, she is selling herself, her mind, and her skills...


All of which create the fantasy you are buying.

I appreciate all visitors who wish to understand me by reading what I have produced, but to see pics of me or my friends, though, is to pay the $30 monthly subscription. The price is about the pay-toll between Milan and Rome. I would hope that you are here for my writings, and so therefore I have no sympathy for your desire to possess copyrighted images of me and my friends without payment.


The site is either a porn site, or a site to begin to understand her inner workings, and in thus learning more about her, her being, and her a person, to understand that there is more to a person than physical looks...


Have you never seen an amateur porn site before? They all say this sort of thing.

Either she is selling porn, or not, if she isn't selling porn, then she is selling her skills, and abilities, and if she is selling that, then there is a claim for false advertisement.


You're really grasping at straws to try to come up with any kind of reason to complain about this. If you're not going to buy it, why do you care? Those who are buying it obviously know what they're getting and don't have a problem with it. Those who pay and think they'll get a cheese grater or a new TV or something, need to check their head.
The more confusion... the more profit.
User avatar
IceOwl
 
Posts: 281
Joined: January 13th, 2005, 2:22 pm
Location: Om

Postby Tina » November 21st, 2006, 10:36 pm

Both of you, knock it off. Ever since the Mac/PC thread, you two seem to take some sort of perverse glee in baiting each other. I've had enough. I've used the ban stick once tonight. Keep it up and it'll be more than once.
User avatar
Tina
Chloe Vevrier Lookalike
 
Posts: 230
Joined: February 27th, 2005, 8:55 am

Postby HeavyMetal1980 » November 25th, 2006, 3:03 am

Anekee in general could be considered bullshit. "She" ( I say that in quotes since many conspiracy theories claim that "she" is actually a man pretending to be a woman, with a woman's photos for added affect ) is an internet mystery with the only true constants being an EXTREME hatred for Americans and men.

At one point in time, I strongly defended Anekee ( mostly because I am a "rebel" that is attracted to "rebellious" thinking ... OK, OK.... and she had nice tits... I think ) but if you spent any reasonable time on Anekee's actual forum ( NOT the BEA ) then you might understand just how crazy "Anekee" actually is. Yes, I tried and I tried... but even my patience finally ran out. Does that shock any "BEA" people here?

The question of "Who is Anekee?" and "are Anekee's tits real or morphed?" will most likely continue for many years, but the truth is, that until you travel to Anekee's actual forum, paticipate, use the search function, discover the true controversy and all the real pain, you will never really understand the true monster that you are dealing with.

Yes... I once "loved" Anekee until the lies became too obvious to ignore. I defended Anekee until I realized I was betraying myself by doing so. I was fooled and I'll admit that now. However, the BEA did not convince me of that. Anekee herself did ( and one of her rebellious moderators, named "Italkdirty"... as well as Anekee's "boyfriend" Bardamu ).

The BEA and TOF... you think you have the story... but people like me actually lived it. People like me know the "true" ( if one could even say that ) nature of the beast, whilst you can only guess. I didn't just see Hell... I visited Hell and somehow came back to talk about it. Every once and a while, I get bored enough to visit Satan for old time's sake...
Image
User avatar
HeavyMetal1980
Mr. Heavy Metal Person
 
Posts: 334
Joined: April 3rd, 2005, 5:49 am

Postby IceOwl » November 25th, 2006, 10:40 am

Tina wrote:Both of you, knock it off. Ever since the Mac/PC thread, you two seem to take some sort of perverse glee in baiting each other. I've had enough. I've used the ban stick once tonight. Keep it up and it'll be more than once.


This doesn't make any sense. We can't have any sort of debate here? I think we're being pretty civilised.
The more confusion... the more profit.
User avatar
IceOwl
 
Posts: 281
Joined: January 13th, 2005, 2:22 pm
Location: Om

Postby Tina » November 25th, 2006, 1:16 pm

It makes perfect sense. You know that you can goad Merkitty, and you do so at every turn. This forum is not a place for your personal pissing contests. If you want to argue with one another, take it to PM. We've had enough of juvenile behavior over the last few days.

Now, if you're somehow incapable of understanding the word "stop", and the consequences of not stopping, then by all means, keep it up. You've been warned twice now. There won't be a third.
User avatar
Tina
Chloe Vevrier Lookalike
 
Posts: 230
Joined: February 27th, 2005, 8:55 am

Postby IceOwl » November 25th, 2006, 3:00 pm

Tina wrote:It makes perfect sense. You know that you can goad Merkitty, and you do so at every turn.


I'm not trying to goad anyone. Am I not allowed to disagree with anyone?

This forum is not a place for your personal pissing contests.


It's not personal, nor is it a pissing contest. I'm trying to inject some reason into this stupid issue that keeps popping up.

If you want to argue with one another, take it to PM. We've had enough of juvenile behavior over the last few days.


Then delete the thread and ban everyone that ever posts anything controversial, since that seems to be your style.

Now, if you're somehow incapable of understanding the word "stop", and the consequences of not stopping, then by all means, keep it up. You've been warned twice now. There won't be a third.


I'm not even arguing about the topic anymore. You're making a bigger deal out of this than it really is. If this post results in my bannination, then I'll suggest you might as well go one step further and ban everyone since everyone will invariably disagree about something.
The more confusion... the more profit.
User avatar
IceOwl
 
Posts: 281
Joined: January 13th, 2005, 2:22 pm
Location: Om

Postby rtpoe » November 25th, 2006, 8:14 pm

I just look at the nice boobies. It's all fantasy anyway, so who gives a damn?

rtpoe
User avatar
rtpoe
 
Posts: 714
Joined: December 28th, 2004, 6:47 pm

Postby IceOwl » November 25th, 2006, 10:41 pm

At last, someone who understands!
The more confusion... the more profit.
User avatar
IceOwl
 
Posts: 281
Joined: January 13th, 2005, 2:22 pm
Location: Om

Next

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

 

Who is online

In total there are 3 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 3 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 350 on June 26th, 2012, 7:59 am

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests