Push Up Burst!
Posted: November 6th, 2006, 5:00 pm
Page 1 of 2
Posted: November 6th, 2006, 5:00 pmPosted: November 6th, 2006, 5:01 pm
Posted: November 6th, 2006, 5:02 pm
Posted: November 6th, 2006, 5:04 pm
Posted: November 6th, 2006, 5:06 pm
Posted: November 6th, 2006, 5:06 pm
Posted: November 6th, 2006, 5:08 pmHere are some of my latest works. If someone asks, why is cgiboobfantasy.com offline? Well i'm waiting for the release of Poser 7, i preordered it. It makes animations possible, with renderfarms. In other words, i can speed up the production of images and finally render videos that are longer then 10 secons (a movie of so much seconds takes 4 days to render in HQ! sjeesh)
Posted: November 6th, 2006, 5:28 pmVery cool, BoobRepli. Very cool. Hope everything goes off without a hitch! 
Q-"But, no, sadly, I won't be attending your premiere"-BE
Q-"But, no, sadly, I won't be attending your premiere"-BE
Posted: November 6th, 2006, 6:13 pmSarcastic alarm!
Posted: November 6th, 2006, 8:21 pmNicely done. Leila's hair is wonky, but hair's an absolute bitch. What are you planning on using for the farm?
Posted: November 7th, 2006, 4:41 amAll the blood went out of my nose...
Posted: November 7th, 2006, 12:36 pmI love the last one; the pose is great and the expression's more or less spot-on (yes, I actually looked at her face 
). The third one from the top looks like her neck's a little long to me, and the hair's a bit stiff.
That's what jumped out right away, but great job, as usual. Good luck with the new Poser!
). The third one from the top looks like her neck's a little long to me, and the hair's a bit stiff.
That's what jumped out right away, but great job, as usual. Good luck with the new Poser!
Posted: November 8th, 2006, 9:53 pmNot to sound rude, as these are nice works but...
Boobrepli? Why do you always announce leaving only to return a short time later? Why not just stay and tough out the good versus the bad?
Boobrepli? Why do you always announce leaving only to return a short time later? Why not just stay and tough out the good versus the bad?
Posted: November 9th, 2006, 1:27 pmPoser 7?
Hm...(looks it up)
Wow, support for multi-core processors. HRDI rendering. I don't see anything about render farms, but I'd be surprised if they haven't added it again. I've been wondering what the hold up has been for the past two versions.
Good luck with getting it right as it's released. Poser's releases in the past have been horribly buggy.
Hm...(looks it up)
Wow, support for multi-core processors. HRDI rendering. I don't see anything about render farms, but I'd be surprised if they haven't added it again. I've been wondering what the hold up has been for the past two versions.
Good luck with getting it right as it's released. Poser's releases in the past have been horribly buggy.
Posted: November 15th, 2006, 3:14 pmwork like that was made me come out of hiding 0_0 really good work
Posted: November 17th, 2006, 11:35 pmThe solution is not render farms. The probem lies in posers limited render engine and lighting solution. HDRI while a useful tool (Image based lighting) only increases render times.
Radiosity, caustics and other processor intensive ray tracing mechanisms yeild excellent results, but chew up cpu cycles. Poser lacks the tools to create acceptable work arounds and alternatives to cpu intensive ray tracing techniques.
Take Lightwave by Newtek. This is a industry standard tool for film and television. This software allows the artist many alternatives to simulate radiosity and HDRI lighting effects with results that are hard to distinguish from the images created using the more cpu intensive methods.
Character based scenes are typically the least render intensive. Images that have many reflective, transparent, or volumetric elements require the most. In lightwave even using rediosity as the rendering solution character model renders rather quickly. Even so using certain lighting tricks available to the user of that software yeilds equal results at a fraction of the time.
My renders of DAZ characters in lightwave even in 1024 X 728 rarely take more than 15 seconds per alliasing pass. At my usual level of detail a frame typically takes no longer than 40 seconds per frame. and thats being lazy. I could probably shave 15 seconds off of that if I optimize my scene elements and tweak the lighting solution.
Bottom line is, if you are really serious about animation, with realistic lighting and rendering solutions, then you have to move beyond Poser and invest and learn one of the profrssional applications like Lightwave, Maya, SoftImage, etc. Poser if fine for print and visualization work but for dynamic applications and animation it is woefully inadaquate.
Radiosity, caustics and other processor intensive ray tracing mechanisms yeild excellent results, but chew up cpu cycles. Poser lacks the tools to create acceptable work arounds and alternatives to cpu intensive ray tracing techniques.
Take Lightwave by Newtek. This is a industry standard tool for film and television. This software allows the artist many alternatives to simulate radiosity and HDRI lighting effects with results that are hard to distinguish from the images created using the more cpu intensive methods.
Character based scenes are typically the least render intensive. Images that have many reflective, transparent, or volumetric elements require the most. In lightwave even using rediosity as the rendering solution character model renders rather quickly. Even so using certain lighting tricks available to the user of that software yeilds equal results at a fraction of the time.
My renders of DAZ characters in lightwave even in 1024 X 728 rarely take more than 15 seconds per alliasing pass. At my usual level of detail a frame typically takes no longer than 40 seconds per frame. and thats being lazy. I could probably shave 15 seconds off of that if I optimize my scene elements and tweak the lighting solution.
Bottom line is, if you are really serious about animation, with realistic lighting and rendering solutions, then you have to move beyond Poser and invest and learn one of the profrssional applications like Lightwave, Maya, SoftImage, etc. Poser if fine for print and visualization work but for dynamic applications and animation it is woefully inadaquate.
Posted: November 18th, 2006, 5:56 amI'm no fan of Poser, but with Poser there are many female models available, clothes and props to buy, and the "Super Bust" module to make BE women.
I've never seen anything even close for Lightwave, Maya, SoftImage, etc.
It looks like you're a 3-D professional, have you done much BE art with those other packages?
I've never seen anything even close for Lightwave, Maya, SoftImage, etc.
It looks like you're a 3-D professional, have you done much BE art with those other packages?
Posted: November 18th, 2006, 8:38 amHmmm.
Poser 7: 250USD
Lightwave: 800USD
Yeah, I'd sure as hell expect it to be better.
Poser 7: 250USD
Lightwave: 800USD
Yeah, I'd sure as hell expect it to be better.
Posted: November 19th, 2006, 6:46 pmBoo! Lightwave sucks! 3DSMax is the program to use! 
3dSMax!
3dSMax!Posted: December 9th, 2006, 7:05 amLightwave VS 3DSmax, the clash! 
I only use poser because rigging WITH morph is a pain in the ass for both external renderers. And i don't have the money to buy those programs also AND poser 7 has faster render capabilities with HDR support... Anyhow, i bought Poser 7, it will be released on 20 december, so when it's christmas expect the new version of the site, i'm already working on it. It will be a "flex" portal. More about that soon, as i give member "10000 silicone credits". With those you can invest in a model her chest :p So basicly the members decide how big every model can go. Check the temporary page on:
http://www.cgiboobfantasy.com/
I only use poser because rigging WITH morph is a pain in the ass for both external renderers. And i don't have the money to buy those programs also AND poser 7 has faster render capabilities with HDR support... Anyhow, i bought Poser 7, it will be released on 20 december, so when it's christmas expect the new version of the site, i'm already working on it. It will be a "flex" portal. More about that soon, as i give member "10000 silicone credits". With those you can invest in a model her chest :p So basicly the members decide how big every model can go. Check the temporary page on:
http://www.cgiboobfantasy.com/
Posted: December 18th, 2006, 10:49 amWonderful pics! Gives me alot of inspiration ^_^
Posted: December 29th, 2006, 2:53 pmThat's some fabulous work there. A million times better than those ones I just saw in the other thread, ten thumbs up. 
Posted: December 29th, 2006, 3:47 pmWhat other thread?Daimyo Warajimushi wrote:That's some fabulous work there. A million times better than those ones I just saw in the other thread, ten thumbs up.
Posted: December 29th, 2006, 4:44 pmToymaker wrote:What other thread?Daimyo Warajimushi wrote:That's some fabulous work there. A million times better than those ones I just saw in the other thread, ten thumbs up.
The one right next to this one by the same bloke?
Here; http://www.overflowingforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=1253
Posted: December 29th, 2006, 7:14 pmAha, gotcha.
Yeah, these are better than those.
Yeah, these are better than those.
Posted: December 29th, 2006, 10:31 pmBut what's the deal with your CGIBOOBFANTASY.COM, Boobrepli? Had a great promise of stuff by Christmas and then POOF! Vanished again.
(sigh)
(sigh)
Posted: January 2nd, 2007, 3:52 pmI'm still in a learning curve for Poser 7
Here is my latest:
Here is my latest:
Posted: January 2nd, 2007, 5:16 pmHer breasts are a little too... soft(?) She shouldn't be indenting them like that- it's more like she's holding up, um, I don't know exactly, but I'm pretty sure boobs don't quite work that way... the indentations are too large for something as soft as breastflesh, they should be sagging over her hands., at least a little
The curve in her back is a bit much for my taste, her left breast doesn't look like it's attached to her body, and is there supposed to be a seam where her right leg meets her crotch?
I do love the look on her face though, and the hair and skin look great. Really nice job with the veins in her boobs, too.
The curve in her back is a bit much for my taste, her left breast doesn't look like it's attached to her body, and is there supposed to be a seam where her right leg meets her crotch?
I do love the look on her face though, and the hair and skin look great. Really nice job with the veins in her boobs, too.
Posted: January 3rd, 2007, 8:51 pmHave to agree that the boobs look wrong--more balloon than boob--but that got me to stand up and pay attention.
Posted: January 3rd, 2007, 11:33 pmBillPratt wrote:Have to agree that the boobs look wrong--more balloon than boob--but that got me to stand up and pay attention.
Wait... She's not too flat?